SUPREME COURT HELD THAT NO PERSON IS ENTITLED TO A COPY OF STATEMENT RECORDED UNDER SECTION 164 CRPC TILL THE APPROPRIATE COGNISANCE ORDERS ARE PASSED BY THE COURT AFTER THE CHARGE SHEET IS FILED.
NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET KUMAR 8383098478 , 9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 , 9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Miss ‘A’ vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr, (2020) 10 SC CK 0011 A Full Bench of the Supreme Court held that under no circumstances copies of statements recorded under Section 164 of the CRPC can be furnished till appropriate orders are passed by the Court after taking cognizance in the matter. The Court also held that merely because the charge-sheet was filed did not entitle the Accused to a copy of the statement under Section 164 of the CRPC. The Supreme Court also observed that the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court in Raju Janki Yadav vs. State of U.P. and others (2012) 05 AHC CK 0294 = Criminal Miscellan...